http://www.zeiss.com/c12567a8003b58b9/ContentsFrame/8baac109cb80bddfc12571e100393a1b



Shoot by Sony Ericsson W900i, viewed from my company. Do you see the Taipei 101?

My first camera with built-in CZ lens is Contax T2, which was equipped with a Carl Zeiss T* 38/2.8 lens. I got this one in 1991. Thanks to CZ optics quality, this lens is sharper than all Nikon lenses I owned that time, including AI 35/2, AIS 105/2.5 and AIS micro 55/2.8.
Four years later, I bought a Contax G1. It is an execellent electronic rangfinder with tatanium die-cast. Like most of all traditional rangfinders, the G1 has the ability of interchanging CZ-G lenses. Later, I got all six lenses except the zoom 'Vario-Sonnar'. They are Hologon 16/8, Biogon 21/2.8, 28/2.8, Planar 35/2, 45/2 and the only telephoto Sonnar 90/2. I love the free distortion of the Hologon (just 5 elements), I love the nature tone and extra low distortion of the Biogon, I love the bokeh, nature perspective tone of the Planar, and I love the sharpness of the Sonnar.
It's an AF SLR by Kyocera. At that time, the most attractive and popular N-mount lens is Contax N Vario-Sonnar 24-85/3.5-4.5. It is a short but with the incredible 82mm diameter. From most test reports, it can compete best lenses from Nikon and Canon, and even more superior in color tone and resolution. I totally agreed that and was satified with this lens. Actually, "sharpness" is not always my first concern, I loved its beautiful tone than sharpness. CZ can offer my requirement.
Finally, I owned a D200 and CZ ZF 85/1.4. That's the story.音樂 + 攝影 + 重型機車 Give me classical music, give me photography, give me big bike, or nothing